The Shift From Specialized School Safety Tools to “All-In-One” Platforms or Companies

In the school safety marketplace, many security product and technology vendors begin with one strong core service. Hypothetically, it may start with a visitor management platform. Or perhaps a panic alert technology. Maybe it is even emergency management software, tip reporting, or threat assessment tools.

At first, the company and product is often highly focused. The product may be relatively clean, responsive, and reliable. Customer support tends to be stronger. Updates are targeted toward improving the core service schools originally purchased.

But then the bundling begins.

Let’s say visitor management gets bundled with emergency alerts. Emergency alerts get bundled with reunification software and apps. Then we get some behavioral reporting tools and threat assessment modules added. Then drill management is added. Toss in some wellness monitoring. Don’t forget some AI analytics to layer on top. Suddenly, the company attempts to do everything for everybody.

The Business Goal of the School Security Vendor Is Simple

The motivation behind this trend is not complicated: Bundle more services, expand contracts, and increase recurring revenue and profit margins. Sell it all as a “one stop shop” or “integrated systems.” All the while, make your products and services harder for districts to replace you.

From a business perspective, the strategy makes sense. Companies want larger market share, higher valuations, and deeper customer dependence on their platforms.

But schools should recognize that business growth strategies do not automatically translate into better operational outcomes for educators.

When the Core School Safety Products Starts Slipping

Too often, the quality of the original core service begins to diminish as companies expand their products and bundles.

Over the past couple of years, we have increasingly observed this during school security and emergency preparedness assessments in districts nationwide. In particular, some visitor management systems that once functioned reasonably well as standalone tools now appear less reliable and more cumbersome after companies expanded into broader bundled service models.

In one school district, two school security consultants with more than 40 years experience in the profession were unable to both successfully sign in at school and administrative sites using the district’s visitor management system. School secretaries were observably frustrated with the system by the second school the consultants visited.

At one school, we self-entered that we were five days or five months old and the system printed a badge. At another school, I signed in as serial killer Jeffrey Dahmer and used his birthday.

The point was not to play games. But it was to show that the problem was not untrained or inexperienced school office staff using the system, as vendors may try to default to as an explanation. It was two independent school security consultants very well versed in school visitor management systems.

For the record, we did sign-in with our real names and under the supervision of school staff at each site. The point was to try the system, which was an epic failure – not just for us, but for those who had to use it daily. And school leaders reported repeated attempts over the months through multiple vendor service representatives to get help to get things on track in their district.

But rest assured, bundled services were there as an option if the district wanted to purchase those, too.

Some common challenges schools may experience:

Districts can end up with what amounts to a digital “junk drawer” of partially implemented features rather than a high-quality operational tool.

Bigger Bundles Are Not Always Better

School leaders should approach bundled security services and platforms carefully and critically. There certainly are well-intended and credible security vendors, but that doesn’t mean the bottom line isn’t really the bottom line: Bigger sales.

More features do not necessarily equal better outcomes. A larger platform does not automatically create a safer school. And companies claiming to do everything exceptionally well deserve thoughtful scrutiny.

Technology should support school operations, not overwhelm them.

Questions School Leaders Should Ask

Before purchasing or expanding bundled school security services, school leaders should ask practical operational questions:

Final Thought: Do Everything for All or One Thing Exceptionally Well?

School security is not a plug-and-play sport. Technology can support people and processes, but it cannot compensate for weak implementation, poor training, or operational overload.

Sometimes the best solution is not the platforms or companies that do everything. It is simply the company and platform that still does one important thing exceptionally well.


Dr. Kenneth S. Trump is President of National School Safety and Security Services  

National School Safety and Security Services

Experts You Can Trust!

Connect with Dr. Ken on Linkedin: www.linkedin.com/in/kentrump/

Follow Dr. Ken on X(Twitter) @safeschools

Visit and “Like” Our Facebook School Safety News Channel at: www.facebook.com/schoolsafety

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *