The viral video of a South Carolina School Resource Officer (SRO) dragging a female student out of a classroom chair raises as many questions about a failure of school administration as it raises questions about school officer tactics and best practices in school-based policing.

Three wrongs a disaster makes

“This situation was a no-win as soon as the officer walked in the room.”  This observation was repeated over and over in my discussions with veteran school safety experts, SROs, educators and police administrators about an encounter in which Richland County (SC) Sheriff’s Department deputy and SRO, when called to a classroom at Spring Valley High School to remove a non-compliant female student, escalated into a forceful physical confrontation.

“Who is responsible?,” is a common question. People seek to find someone to blame. We look for a victim, a villain and a vindicator.

Three wrongs appear to have contributed to a disastrous outcome:

  1. The student appears to have been wrong three times. She failed to follow the classroom rules and directions of the teacher. She failed to follow a reasonable request of a school administrator. And she failed to follow the reasonable verbal requests of a police officer. These wrongs do not justify an excessive use of force, but they must be acknowledged as a significant part of this scenario.
  2. The school administration appears wrong in thrusting a police officer into a school disciplinary matter. One of the most acknowledged best practices of SRO programs is the separation of administrative school disciplinary roles from the roles of a school-based police officer. In this case, the school administration pulled the school’s SRO into a matter involving what has consistently been reported as a non-compliant student. Violent, threatening students fall within the realm of SRO interventions. Managing non-compliant students who are non-threatening is the job of the school administrator. Questions also loom as to whether the administrator could have engaged numerous other options, such as those discussed below, without engaging the officer.
  3. The SRO appears wrong in taking the lead in a school administrative matter, did not appear to explore other options for intervention,  and according to his department’s investigation, was wrong in an excessive amount of force used in the encounter.

These “three wrongs” appear to have had a cumulative downhill effect. In short, this “no win” situation became worse and worse as the scenario unfolded.

Overly aggressive school police officers are often a sign of a weak school administration

When we see School Resource Officers (SROs) involved in an arrest and physical altercation with a student in a classroom, it often points to failures of school administration to take the lead in handling school discipline instead of sending their SRO to do the job of a principal.

The first step in intervention in a school disciplinary matter should be by the school disciplinarian – the principal or assistant principal, not the police officer. If a situation becomes violent, a student is threatening and/or a student has weapon, the officer can and should intervene when needed. But caution must be taken not to put the officer in a position where he or she will be forced to turn to an arrest as a solution to a non-violent disciplinary matter that an administrator should have handled in the first place.

We have a saying when working with principals, superintendents and School Resource Officers on these issues: When you see an overly aggressive school police officer, it is often a sign of a weak school administrator. The primary responsibility for non-compliant student discipline rests with the principal and assistant principal, not the police.

Missed opportunities to engage intervention options

The Spring Valley High School confrontation suggests that there were a number of potential missed opportunities for other interventions including:

Providing classroom teachers with classroom management and deescalation training, intervention training for school staff, clear agreements between school and police officials on the roles of SROs, and numerous other strategies can help school leaders prevent or better respond to such challenging scenarios without quickly resorting to thrusting school police into school discipline.

Politicizing of school safety only worsens the situation

An ugly situation like that at Spring Valley High School only intensifies as school safety becomes more and more politicized throughout the United States. This situation quickly escalated to suspended students, a fired SRO, a student walkout protest in support of the officer, a federal civil rights investigation, allegations of racial motivations, and exploitation of the incident by special interest groups who advocated for the removal of all police from schools, etc.

A few specific observations in this case include:

Training on principal-police partnerships based upon best practices: Derailing the school-to-prison pipeline while preserving school police programs

School Resource Officers (SROs) are a great asset in school safety.  We support the SRO concept when it is operating properly and consistent with best practices. Too often we increasingly hear from superintendents and school boards concerns about their SRO operation.

As with curriculum, or any program in the school environment, periodic evaluation is critical to success. However, this evaluation can, at times, be difficult for school safety leaders. School administrators and police often duck and dodge the tough issues regarding the intersection of their roles, conflicting mindsets, and tough questions about race, bias and viewpoints on managing student behaviors.

Our workshop on Policing the Schools: Strategies for Effective Principal-Police Partnerships is one step in identifying ways to keep SRO programs on track and consistent with best practices to avoid high-profile scenarios like the Spring Valley High School altercation. Our multi-disciplinary team of school security and police experts, school administrators, school psychologists, and communications specialists have been training and consulting with school districts and school-based police on better clarifying the roles of SROs and principals. An experienced independent team of school safety professionals can nudge conversations and help focus issues that may never be addressed without skilled support.

Our work has unveiled situations that have superintendents to redefine practices where assistant principals and principals often send school-based police to classrooms instead of taking the lead in intervening as the school administrator.   In one district, the new superintendent was shocked to learn in our workshop that school police in his district were routinely handcuffing students while escorting them from the classroom to the principals’ offices. Procedures were changed so that school principals and assistant principals, not the SRO, were dispatched to classrooms when teachers called for assistance with defiant students.
We often say that, “You can’t change the climate if you don’t change the conversation.” It is time for school and law enforcement leaders to have these conversations for the best interest of their students, SRO programs and school-communities.

Ken Trump

National School Safety and Security Services

Experts You Can Trust! 

Visit School Security Blog at: www.schoolsecurity.org/blog

Follow Ken on Twitter @safeschools

Visit and “Like” Our Facebook School Safety News Channel at: www.facebook.com/schoolsafety

2 Responses

  1. I love this article. I work for the school system in bridgeport Connecticut and we removed SRO’s from the building. We use this techniques mentioned in the article when dealing with a defiant student that refuses to leave a classroom.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *